HP Photosmart M527

7 Reasons why HP Photosmart M527 is better

than the average

166gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.Measurably better color depth
36bitsvs 23bits (the average)
vs 42bits (best: HP Photosmart R927)
The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
63mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
4.Explicitly less body volume
220cm³vs 531cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
36mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
6.Has an optical viewfinder
Yesvs No (71% don't have it)
An optical viewfinder (or OVF) allows the photographer to compose a shot while seeing exactly what the lens sees. There is no time lag and they require no power - as opposed to electronic viewfinders which can drain battery life. They are also better in low light situations.
7.Reasonably wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart M527
HP Photosmart M527 specs
HP Photosmart M527 features
HP Photosmart M527 pros and cons
HP Photosmart M527 advantages
HP Photosmart M527 disadvantages