HP Photosmart M537

6 Reasons why HP Photosmart M537 is better

than the average

170gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
64mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
96mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
4.Substantially less body volume
190.46cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
31mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
6.Lots wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart M537
HP Photosmart M537 specs
HP Photosmart M537 features
HP Photosmart M537 pros and cons
HP Photosmart M537 advantages
HP Photosmart M537 disadvantages