HP Photosmart R818

8 Reasons why HP Photosmart R818 is better

than the average

166gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.Distinctly better color depth
36bitsvs 23bits (the average)
vs 42bits (best: HP Photosmart R927)
The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
57mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
91mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
5.Considerably less body volume
155.61cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
30mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
7.Supports AVCHD format
Yesvs No (75% don't have it)
AVCHD (Advanced Video Coding High Definition) is a file-based format for the digital recording and playback of high-definition video. It's a standard popular among professional cameras and camcorders.
8.Plenty wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart R818
HP Photosmart R818 specs
HP Photosmart R818 features
HP Photosmart R818 pros and cons
HP Photosmart R818 advantages
HP Photosmart R818 disadvantages