HP Photosmart R927

10 Reasons why HP Photosmart R927 is better

than the average

170gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.Substantially better color depth
42bitsvs 23bits (the average)
vs 42bits (best: HP Photosmart R927)
The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
62mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
96mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
5.Vastly less body volume
154.75cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
26mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
7.Can create panoramas in-camera
Yesvs No (64% don't have it)
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
8.Marginally bigger screen size
3"vs 3" (the average)
vs 4.8" (best: Samsung Galaxy Camera (Wi-Fi))
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
9.Supports AVCHD format
Yesvs No (75% don't have it)
AVCHD (Advanced Video Coding High Definition) is a file-based format for the digital recording and playback of high-definition video. It's a standard popular among professional cameras and camcorders.
10.Much wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart R927
HP Photosmart R927 specs
HP Photosmart R927 features
HP Photosmart R927 pros and cons
HP Photosmart R927 advantages
HP Photosmart R927 disadvantages