Leica M-E Typ 220

10 Reasons why Leica M-E Typ 220 is better

than the average

1.Amply more megapixels (photo)
18MPvs 17MP (the average)
vs 108MP (best: Panono Camera)
2.Explicitly larger sensor
36 x 24mmvs 14.6 x 10.8mm (the average)
vs 81.2 x 25.4mm (best: Polaroid Snap)
The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.
80mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
4.Clearly more battery power
1860mAhvs 1212mAh (the average)
vs 4360mAh (best: Samsung Galaxy NX Mirrorless)
5.Way less body volume
411.44cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
37mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
7.Is a system camera
Yesvs No (58% don't have it)
A system camera has lots of changeable parts such as lenses, flashes and other accessories. They offer greater flexibility than compact cameras.
8.Has an optical viewfinder
Yesvs No (71% don't have it)
An optical viewfinder (or OVF) allows the photographer to compose a shot while seeing exactly what the lens sees. There is no time lag and they require no power - as opposed to electronic viewfinders which can drain battery life. They are also better in low light situations.
9.Has manual shutter speed
Yesvs No (56% don't have it)
This allows to manually set the shutter speed.
10.Better magnification factor
0.68xvs 0.47x (the average)
vs 10x (best: Pentax X-5)
A true macro lens has a magnification of 1:1. This means that the image produced is a life-size representation of the subject being photographed.
Leica M-E Typ 220
Leica M-E Typ 220 specs
Leica M-E Typ 220 features
Leica M-E Typ 220 pros and cons
Leica M-E Typ 220 advantages
Leica M-E Typ 220 disadvantages