LG 29EB93NEC X401S
Top 20%701 points
Top 20%
Top 14%754 points
Top 14%
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
vs
Top specs and features

LG 29EB93 vs NEC X401S: 33 facts in comparison

1. response time

Response time is how long it takes for a display to change the state of pixels, in order to show new content. The less time it takes to respond, the less likely it is to blur fast-changing images.
5ms
Samsung CHG70 32": 1ms
8ms

2. power consumption operation

How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.
48W
Sharp LB-1085: 1.1W
110W

3. every pixel has three subpixels

The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
85% have it

4. screen size

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
29"
Sharp LB-1085: 108"
40"

5. has a HDMI output

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
60% have it

6. supports total tilt

Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
83% have it

7. contrast ratio

Contrast ratio is the visual distance between the lightest and the darkest colors that may be reproduced on the display. A high contrast ratio is desired, resulting in richer dark colors and more distinctive color gradation.
5000000:1
Acer XB0 XB240H 24": 100000000:1
3500:1

8. has anti-glare

Anti-glare helps to reduce the external reflections of light coming from outside the display.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
27% have it

9. has an IPS screen

IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
33% have it

10. weight

8.06kg lighter.
6.84kg
Asus VX278Q 27": 4.5g
14.9kg

11. has a DVI connector

Devices that have a DVI connector (usually computers and notebooks) can be connected to the TV set.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
56% have it

12. resolution

33.33% higher resolution.
2560 x 1080px
Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 7680 x 4320px
1920 x 1080px

13. height

219mm shorter.
318mm
Asus VP228N 21.5": 3.9mm
537mm

14. power consumption on standby

How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.
1.2W
Asus MB168B Plus: 0W
2W

16. has stereo speakers

Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
29% have it

17. maximum horizontal viewing angle

Horizontal viewing angle is the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.
178º
Acer Predator X35 35" UW-UXGA: 178º
178º

18. pixel density

1.74x higher pixel density.
95.81ppi
Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 280ppi
55ppi

19. thickness

26mm thinner.
69mm
LG 22EA53VQ: 5.5mm
43mm

20. has an LED-backlit display

Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colors and richer blacks.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
79% have it

21. has a VGA connector

VGA connector is a widespread connector and is found on many video cards, computer monitors, and some television sets.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
76% have it

22. Supports VESA mount

The VESA mount is a standard used by most manufacturers. A device that supports the VESA mount can be mounted on many different supports, from arms to wall mounts.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
69% have it

23. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack

With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
41% have it

24. width

225.3mm narrower.
699.7mm
Toshiba PA3923U-2LC3: 340.5mm
925mm

25. supports Ethernet

Ethernet is a local area network technology.
LG 29EB93
NEC X401S
3% have it

Top 10 monitors

Add to comparison
    Compare
    This page is currently only available in English.