Olympus VG-145

8 Reasons why Olympus VG-145 is better

than the average

120gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
57mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
96mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
4.Noticeably less body volume
103.97cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
19mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
6.Modestly bigger screen size
3"vs 3" (the average)
vs 4.8" (best: Samsung Galaxy Camera (Wi-Fi))
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
7.Lots wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
8.Shorter minimum focal length
26mmvs 27mm (the average)
vs 1.18mm (best: HP Photosmart R937)
A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
Olympus VG-145
Olympus VG-145 specs
Olympus VG-145 features
Olympus VG-145 pros and cons
Olympus VG-145 advantages
Olympus VG-145 disadvantages