Ricoh CX4

13 Reasons why Ricoh CX4 is better

than the average

1.Clearly lower noise at high ISO
1600ISOvs 957ISO (the average)
vs 3702ISO (best: Sony Alpha 7S)
The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Source: DxOMark.
205gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
3.Reasonably higher pixel density
462ppivs 360ppi (the average)
vs 544ppi (best: Sony A7)
4.Has a built-in HDR mode
Yesvs No (74% don't have it)
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
58.6mmvs 95.2mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
6.Noticeably less body volume
174.87cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
29.4mmvs 50.8mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
8.Appreciably higher resolution
831x1,108pxvs 875x609px (the average)
vs 1,517x1,011px (best: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2K + Lumix G Vario 14-42mm/ F3.5-5.6 ASPH./ MEGA O.I.S)
9.Modestly bigger screen size
3"vs 3" (the average)
vs 4.8" (best: Samsung Galaxy Camera (Wi-Fi))
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
10.Clearly less shutter lag
0.1svs 16.3s (the average)
vs 0.00025s (best: Leica M Typ 240)
The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
11.Has a BSI sensor
Yesvs No (81% don't have it)
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
12.Sizably less startup delay
2.6svs 34.8s (the average)
vs 0.01s (best: Nikon D70)
It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.
13.Vastly longer maximum focal length
300mmvs 273mm (the average)
vs 2000mm (best: Nikon Coolpix P900)
A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.
Ricoh CX4
Ricoh CX4 specs
Ricoh CX4 features
Ricoh CX4 pros and cons
Ricoh CX4 advantages
Ricoh CX4 disadvantages