Comparing RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Nokia Asha 302

1. RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320

24 Reasons why RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 is better

Comparing RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Nokia Asha 302

1.Clearly more battery power
1450mAhvs 1320mAh (Nokia Asha 302)
2.Sizably more megapixels (photo)
3.2MPvs 3.15MP (Nokia Asha 302)
3.Significantly more RAM memory
0.5GBvs 0.12GB (Nokia Asha 302)
4.Lighter
103gvs 106g (Nokia Asha 302)
5.Thinner
12.7mmvs 13.9mm (Nokia Asha 302)
6.Vastly more internal storage
0.5GBvs 0.1GB (Nokia Asha 302)
7.Direct updates by OS vendor
Yesvs No (Nokia Asha 302)
It can be updated directly by the OS vendor, so no need to wait until the manufacturer or network provider releases an update.
8.Distinctly better video recording quality
480 x 30fpsvs 480 x 15fps (Nokia Asha 302)
9.Shorter
109mmvs 116.5mm (Nokia Asha 302)
10.Has a flash
Yesvs No (Nokia Asha 302)
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
11.Sizably lower SAR for body (USA)
0.75W/kgvs 1.01W/kg (Nokia Asha 302)
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
12.Has a compass
Yesvs No (Nokia Asha 302)
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.
13.Has GPS
Yesvs No (Nokia Asha 302)
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.
BlackBerry 7.1
Yesvs No (Nokia Asha 302)
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320
Tags:
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 specs
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 features
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 pros and cons
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 advantages
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 disadvantages

2. Nokia Asha 302

9 Reasons why Nokia Asha 302 is better

Comparing Nokia Asha 302 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320

1.Faster CPU clock speed
1 x 1GHzvs 1 x 0.8GHz (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
2.Somewhat higher pixel density
167ppivs 164ppi (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
3.Clearly faster downloads
14.4MBits/svs 7.2MBits/s (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
4.Narrower
55.7mmvs 60mm (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
5.Less body volume
72cm³vs 83cm³ (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
6.Plays Adobe Flash
Yesvs No (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.
7.Notably lower SAR for head (USA)
1.27W/kgvs 1.56W/kg (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
8.Significantly lower SAR for head (EU)
1.11W/kgvs 1.24W/kg (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
9.Has a touch screen
Yesvs No (RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320)
You can operate the device easily, by pressing the screen with your fingers.
Nokia Asha 302
Tags:
Nokia Asha 302 specs
Nokia Asha 302 features
Nokia Asha 302 pros and cons
Nokia Asha 302 advantages
Nokia Asha 302 disadvantages