Samsung ES95

9 Reasons why Samsung ES95 is better

than the average

90.3gvs 376.5g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
55.2mmvs 95.2mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
91.6mmvs 96.6mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
4.Significantly less body volume
88.49cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
17.5mmvs 50.8mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
6.Can create panoramas in-camera
Yesvs No (64% don't have it)
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
7.Considerably wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.5vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
8.Sizably shorter minimum focal length
25mmvs 27mm (the average)
vs 1.18mm (best: HP Photosmart R937)
A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
9.Sizably smaller diameter
25mmvs 58mm (the average)
vs 20mm (best: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70)
Samsung ES95
Samsung ES95 specs
Samsung ES95 features
Samsung ES95 pros and cons
Samsung ES95 advantages
Samsung ES95 disadvantages