Comparing Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 vs Nokia Lumia 510

1. Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

28 Reasons why Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is better

Comparing Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 vs Nokia Lumia 510

1.Explicitly more battery power
1500mAhvs 1300mAh (Nokia Lumia 510)
2.Substantially faster CPU clock speed
2 x 1GHzvs 1 x 0.8GHz (Nokia Lumia 510)
3.Sizably more RAM memory
1GBvs 0.25GB (Nokia Lumia 510)
4.Has an external memory slot
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
5.Lighter
115gvs 129g (Nokia Lumia 510)
6.Thinner
9.8mmvs 11.5mm (Nokia Lumia 510)
7.Measurably faster downloads
14.4MBits/svs 7.2MBits/s (Nokia Lumia 510)
8.Is DLNA certified
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
9.Vastly better video recording quality
720 x 30fpsvs 480 x 30fps (Nokia Lumia 510)
10.Narrower
62.7mmvs 64.9mm (Nokia Lumia 510)
11.Noticeably newer Bluetooth version
4vs 2.1 (Nokia Lumia 510)
12.Has a flash
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
13.Distinctly less body volume
74.47cm³vs 81cm³ (Nokia Lumia 510)
14.Notably lower SAR for body (USA)
0.45W/kgvs 0.96W/kg (Nokia Lumia 510)
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
15.Has a front camera
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.
16.Notably lower SAR for head (USA)
0.67W/kgvs 0.85W/kg (Nokia Lumia 510)
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
17.Noticeably lower SAR for head (EU)
0.47W/kgvs 0.65W/kg (Nokia Lumia 510)
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
18.Has a compass
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.
19.Has voice commands
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
You can use your voice to control key functions of the device and you can easily access your device without pushing any button.
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean (API level 17)
Yesvs No (Nokia Lumia 510)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
Tags:
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 specs
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 features
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 pros and cons
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 advantages
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 disadvantages

2. Nokia Lumia 510

6 Reasons why Nokia Lumia 510 is better

Comparing Nokia Lumia 510 vs Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

1.Direct updates by OS vendor
Yesvs No (Samsung Galaxy Ace 3)
It can be updated directly by the OS vendor, so no need to wait until the manufacturer or network provider releases an update.
2.Shorter
120.7mmvs 121.2mm (Samsung Galaxy Ace 3)
3.Has manual exposure
Yesvs No (Samsung Galaxy Ace 3)
This allows to manually set the exposure.
4.Has manual ISO
Yesvs No (Samsung Galaxy Ace 3)
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
5.Has manual white balance
Yesvs No (Samsung Galaxy Ace 3)
With manual white balance you can choose the most accurate setting and avoid the green, blue or red hue which can occur in auto mode. You can also change the setting for artistic effect.
6.Has touch autofocus
Yesvs No (Samsung Galaxy Ace 3)
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.
Nokia Lumia 510
Tags:
Nokia Lumia 510 specs
Nokia Lumia 510 features
Nokia Lumia 510 pros and cons
Nokia Lumia 510 advantages
Nokia Lumia 510 disadvantages